![]()
Other times it is an app that comes with the disto (networks apps in general come to mind). My point wasn’t to get “help” for my individual issues, but just to point out the difficulty for the end user with SELinux. It’s great to tell them to fill out a bug report, but it is not practical for most (by the way, I do report bugs in my distro, Ubuntu, at Launchpad).Most users are just trying to use their computers for daily work, and thus will either disable SELinux or use something else. It is not the fault of SELinux, but just an example of how the lack of standardization sometimes hurts the “end user”. Most of the other distributions I’ve used manage to get along fine without it (or, they’re very good at preventing me from noticing it): I wasn’t going to go to much effort to get something working that I wasn’t convinced I really, desperately needed.I guess my point is that, if you want most/all main-stream distributions to ship and enable SELinux, it needs to be much, much more unobtrusive and self-configuring than it is. It probably should “just work” in most cases, and it should only require the user to do a lot of learning and configuring if the user wants to do something that’s outside of, say, 95% of the normal use cases. ![]() Sticking /home/ on its own partition and re-using it is something that I’ve done several times, is not particularly unusual, and not something that I think a given distribution’s security policy should add (several) extra steps too.Shorter version: SELinux isn’t important enough to be worth me doing a lot of homework.Edit: Actually, I think I did do something along the lines of relabeling it. In our case we lock down the process pretty tightly. Waiting for proxy tunnel chrome mac mac os#That means no network access, and very limited or no access to files and Mach ports.” After this it gets a bit technical, so to prevent misquoting or errors on my end, I suggest you read the rest of the blog post to get an idea of how it works on Mac OS X.Again, we see a case where the fragmentation in Linux as a hindrance to companies releasing software for the platform. Waiting for proxy tunnel chrome mac full#While Linux’ diversity on all levels is a blessing in that it allows for natural selection and competition, it’s also a curse for developers trying to write an application that can work well on as many distributions as possible.I personally tested the recent Mac builds of Chromium on my Intel Mac (PPC is not supported because the V8 JavaScript engine isn’t available for PPC), and while it rendered pages just fine, it was still full of bugs and crashed constantly. My guess is that any final release for the Mac is still a way off, with the Linux version taking even longer.No, I didn’t. Chrome Waiting For Cache Software For The If you are facing the same issue, follow the below steps to fix waiting for proxy tunnel problem in Chrome. When you are dealing with Waiting for proxy tunnel, the web pages don’t load even with an active internet connection. Moreover, it can make the Chrome browsing experience slow and unstable.mac clear cache 1. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |